Proxy Wars
No
doubt China and Russia see themselves as world power counterweights
against the power, influence and strength of the United States as the
world's sole superpower, a financial, military and political giant whose
influence is world-wide, to varying degrees on a shifting world stage.
America is forever engaged in attempts to put out raging regional fires.
It's a useful purpose that should be relied upon through the auspices
of the United Nations, but its attempts have proven frustratingly
futile.
And
while the United States brings this never-ending migraine on itself
through its commitment to democratic order and freedoms and liberties
and good governance, hoping that all it might somehow spread by a kind
of osmosis of persistence, it seems that both China and Russia occupy
themselves with issues of malevolent interference, stirring up problems
to keep the U.S. engaged and enraged.
For
the moment, the North Korean dragon of irascible war-mongering has
settled back into its usual resentful paranoia, attack-collar firmly in
place once again, and the peninsula can express the breath it has held
in suspense for far too long. China's resistance against U.S. hegemony
in its geography put at rest for the moment. Until the next eruption
occurs when Kim Jong-un is once again apoplectic over a UN censure reflecting yet another ballistic missile or nuclear test wracking the neighbourhood.
The fireworks in the Middle East, on the other hand, are raging at full throttle. With Iran helpfully goading Syria's Bashar al-Assad on to 'winning the war' against creeping al-Qaeda terrorists slavering at the bit that Saudi Arabia and Qatar have funded, to slaughter Syrian and Palestinian Shias
along with Syrian Kurds and Christians. And where is Russia in all of
this? Why pledging to restore the long-range missiles that Israel has
latterly destroyed.
"We
have previously stated that the missiles are potentially destabilizing
with respect to the state of Israel. We have made it crystal clear that
we prefer that Russia would not supply them assistance. That is on
record. That hasn't changed", insisted U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry of the transfer of advanced missile defence systems from Russia to Syria.
They
may be used in the regime's defence against the enduring and
unendurable rebel advances. And they most certainly are destined to be
shared with Hezbollah. Assad is nothing if not eternally grateful to
Hezbollah for its defensive presence on Syrian soil. Just as it is happy
with the presence of Iran's Basij militias and the Republican National Guard forces, training and arming and aiding the regime's military.
Russia
is determined to proceed with its sale of S-300 batteries, capable of
targeting manned planes, drones and incoming missiles, representing a
state-of-the-art upgrade for the aging Soviet-supplied defence system
currently in Syria's hands. Which outdated system courteously permitted
Israeli jets access to bomb northeastern Syria's nuclear reactor site
away back when.
It's
a fair question; where is Syria getting the $900-million to pay for the
package of four batteries, six launchers and 144 operational missiles
from Russia? An IOU for the future of indebtedness to Russia and
permanent use of the Syrian Tartis port for the Russian fleet? Scarce
but undeniably vital Iranian treasury funds to ensure that its crucial
partner in the region is not toppled?
Labels: China, Conflict, Defence, Hezbollah Armaments, Iran, Israel, North Korea, Russia, Security, Syria, Threats, United States
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home