The Third Reich Rail Component Enabling the Holocaust

"I blame the railway company for knowingly transporting Jews to the concentration camps and for killing those Jews there in a terrible way."

"I cannot give up because this hurts me every day. Every day I have to think about this and it hurts me. And I want the pain to finally pass."

"I want recognition from them and recognition always comes with an allowance."

Salo Muller, 84, surviving child of Dutch-Jewish Holocaust victims

"The Dutch Jews transported by the Deutsche Reichsbahm have simply been forgotten."

"The state is a hundred percent shareholders in the railways. Germany's moral responsibility always remains."

Axel Hagedorn, Muller lawyer

Snow-covered personal effects of those deported to the Auschwitz concentration camp litter the train tracks leading to the camp's entrance, in an image from around 1945

The German rail system during the Holocaust years of the Second World War ran over a hundred 'Final Solution' trains from the Netherlands to extermination camps such as Auschwitz and Sobibor. As indeed they did from every country of Nazi-occupied Europe, in a massive drive to exterminate European Jews from their countries of origin to satisfy the vision of a 'Judenrein' world. Henrich Himmler, Nazi SS chief in 1943 pleaded for more trains to enable the rapid transport of Jews to slave labour and death camps.

The sole Nazi representing the German train network to be charged was then-rail boss Albert Ganzenmuller, in 1973. On his first court day he suffered a heart attack, adjudged then medically unfit to stand trial. He lived until 1996 with no legal consequences for his role in transporting millions of Jews to their death. Lawyer Hagedorn, on behalf of his client, Salo Muller, has written to German Chancellor Angela Merkel to remind her that history records but does not forgive.

Jews deported from Warsaw Ghetto    US Holocaust Memorial Museum

The heirs of German wartime railways, he wrote, have a moral and clear legal obligation to recognize their predecessors' role in the slaughter of millions of Jews, Sinti and Roma, homosexuals and political dissenters, among others. The Nederlandse Spoorwegen Dutch railway company apologized for its part in the conveyance of Dutch Jews to death camps last year, after Mr. Muller successfully sued them. They paid 50 million euros in compensation, divided among survivors and their families.

Clearly, the German railway company that did the bidding of the Third Reich in its campaign to annihilate European Jewry has an obligation to acknowledge its role in the signal crime of the 20th Century. Salo Muller's parents wee transported by train from Amsterdam to Auschwitz when he was a child. He has lived with that reality all his life, tormented by visions of how his parents suffered and how they perished, all the while knowing that their fate had been shared by millions of other Jews.

Jews loading onto trains at the Umschlagplatz in Warsaw  Wikipedia  

Hie success in holding the Netherlands rail company accountable for their complicity with the Nazi occupation has spurred him to go on to demand that the German rail company admit its own responsibility in uncountable Jewish lives being forfeited to the Final Solution that produced the Holocaust. There are close to 500 Dutch survivors and approximately 5,500 next of kin, all of whom await recognition, admission of responsibility on the part of the German rail company, and accompanying reparations.

The Deutsche Reichbahn operated German railways during the Second World War, transporting about 107,000 Dutch Jews to concentration camps. The company profited to the amount of 15 million euros (in today's approximate currency accounts). During that fearful time in Jewish history, the victims themselves were charged to fund their own travel costs, which took them to their death.

Mr. Muller had been a physiotherapist with the Ajax Dutch soccer club before he embarked on this campaign.

A Civil Servant's Interpretation of Canadian Law

"So while I typed out notes during the phone call, I took the extraordinary and otherwise inappropriate step of making an audio recording of the conversation without so advising the Clerk."
"This is something that I have never done before this phone call and have not done since."
"It does not matter how I would look in doing that -- I would be a mockery, and that is not the problem -- [in acceding to the persistent and frequent urging of principals in the PMO and the Clerk of the Privy Council to shelve her moral principles and go astride the law to satisfy the wish for the Prime Minister to shield SNC Lavalin from criminal prosecution], the bigger problem is what it would look like down the road for the government."
"One, it has never been done before, but two, this is going to look like nothing but political interference by the prime minister, by you, by everyone else that has been involved in politically pressuring me to do this."
"This conversation, previous conversations I’ve had with the PM and people around him are entirely inappropriate. It is political interference."
Jody Wilson-Raybould, former Minister of Justice

"You are not just the attorney general, you are the minister of justice in a cabinet. I am not seeing anything inappropriate here."
"That is not my recollection of the conversation [above]. I do not have an independent recollection of the event. I did not wear a wire, record the conversation or take extemporaneous notes."
Michael Wernick, former Clerk of the Privy Council

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould take part in the grand entrance as the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation commission is released on Dec. 15, 2015. (The Canadian Press)

"[The clerk of the Privy Council Office (PCO) never briefed Justin Trudeau on his talk with ex-attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould."
"[The Prime Minister was] unaware of the full contents of this recording before today."
"[The prime minister] should have spoken directly with the former justice minister and attorney general about this matter — and wishes that she had come to him."
"[There was] clearly an erosion of trust over the past few months between PMO, the clerk of the Privy Council, and the former justice minister and attorney general."
Statement from the Prime Minister's Office

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau professed to being confused over his former Attorney-General's claims of having been relentlessly harassed by his executive assistants and advisers. They, evidently, took it upon themselves with no guidance whatever from him, much less orders, to press Jody Wilson-Rayboult to reconsider her decision not to intervene when the prosecutorial services decided not to extend a DPA agreement to SNC Lavalin over its criminal bribery (under Canadian law) of Libyan officials to secure contracts.

A Delayed Prosecution Agreement which would have resulted in the construction and engineering firm paying a fine, pledging to reform, and getting on with business rather than facing a criminal trial and being restricted from government contracts for a ten-year penalty period. The prosecution service, held to be immune from political interference had determined that SNC did not qualify under the provisions that might exempt it from a criminal trial, and the former Minister of Justice agreed. And she was not amenable to being badgered by anyone to reverse her judgement.

When Michael Wernick returned again to the subject with Wilson-Raybould he made it clear that he was intervening on the direct orders of the prime minister: "Alright...um...well I am going to have to report back before he leaves...he is in a pretty firm frame of mind about this so...I am a bit worried..." It takes no genius mind to infer from that statement that direct and immediate contact took place between himself and the prime minister and what the subject was. And the threat implicit in "Well...it is not a good idea for the Prime Minister and his Attorney General to be at loggerheads" speaks volumes of the reason for Wilson-Raybould's removal as Minister of Justice.

And certainly while Clerk of the Privy Council snapped at the Justice Committee interviewing him about the matter that he wasn't wearing a wire, that he hadn't made a recording, that he simply did not recall the type of details that in her testimony before the committee Jody Wilson-Raybould made it quite clear just how she was being pressured by all and sundry to change her judgement in favour of following the prime minister's line because "jobs were at stake", his recalcitrance to recall was laid bare by the simple reality that someone else recorded a critical conversation revealing absolute proof of malfeasance and false testimony.

And, as Wilson Raybould admitted when she realized that the fix was in and she was about to suffer the consequences: "I am waiting for big...the other shoe to drop, so I am not under any illusion how the Prime Minister has and gets things that he wants...I am just stuck doing the best job that I can..." presaging her dismissal and how wise she was in retrospect to record that damning conversation for posterity and an unfortunate legacy for this dismal failure of a Liberal government headed by a pretentious and unprepared-to-govern, egotistical dilettante.

"The prime minister stated publicly when issues about the propriety of the government's conduct in relation to the SNC matter arose that my ongoing presence in cabinet spoke for itself."
"I resigned the next day and I trust my resignation also speaks for itself."
Jody Wilson-Raybould