Syrian chemical weapons may force Western military action: sources
National Post Wire Services, Associated Press and National Post Staff | Dec 6, 2012 2:14 PM ET | Last Updated: Dec 6, 2012 2:25 PM ET
ODD ANDERSEN/AFP/Getty Images
Rebel soldiers walk through the rubble of building in the northern Syrian city Aleppo on December 6, 2012.
As anonymous sources within the U.S. state department
leak information Syria may be loading warheads with chemical weapons,
sources in France have begun indicating that a Western strike against
the Assad regime could begin very soon.
Although the chemical weapon agents had not yet been loaded into planes, the State Department source, quoted by NBC News, said that if they are “there’s little the outside world can do to stop it.”
French weekly Le Point is reporting that France is preparing a military response similar to that used against Libya. There is no ground assault or sustained air campaign planned, the magazine says, but several smaller raids that would target chemical weapon sites and take away President Bashar al-Assad’s air superiority.
The timing of Syria’s moves on their chemical weapons come as the situation is “accelerating” on the ground, with Assad’s regime losing to the rebels.
Diplomatic efforts to end Syria’s civil war moved forward Thursday with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton joining Russia’s foreign minister and the UN peace envoy to the Arab country for extraordinary three-way talks that suggested Washington and Moscow might finally unite behind a strategy as the Assad regime weakens.
In Washington, Defence Secretary Leon Panetta said intelligence reports raise fears that an increasingly desperate Assad is considering using his chemical weapons arsenal — which the U.S. and Russia agree is unacceptable. It was unclear whether he might target rebels within Syria or bordering countries, but growing concern over such a scenario was clearly adding urgency to discussions an ocean away in Ireland’s capital.
On the sidelines of a human rights conference, Clinton gathered with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and mediator Lakhdar Brahimi to look for a strategy the international community could rally around to end Syria’s 21-month civil war. The former Cold War foes have fought bitterly over how to address the conflict, but Clinton stressed before the meeting that they shared a common goal.
“We have been trying hard to work with Russia to try to stop the
bloodshed in Syria and start a political transition for a post-Assad
Syrian future,” Clinton told reporters in Dublin.
“Events on the ground in Syria are accelerating and we see that in many different ways,” she said. “The pressure against the regime in and around Damascus seems to be increasing. We’ve made it very clear what our position is with respect to chemical weapons, and I think we will discuss that and many other aspects of what is needed to end the violence.”
Earlier Thursday, Clinton and Lavrov met separately for about 25 minutes. They agreed to hear Brahimi out on a path forward, a senior U.S. official said. The two also discussed issues ranging from Egypt to North Korea, as well as new congressional action aimed at Russian officials accused of complicity in the death of lawyer Sergei Magnitsky.
Washington and Moscow have more often publicly chastised each other than cooperated on an international strategy for Syria. The U.S. has criticized Russia for shielding its Arab ally. The Russians have accused the U.S. of meddling by demanding Assad’s downfall and ultimately seeking an armed intervention such as the one last year against the late Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi.
But the gathering of the three key international figures suggests
possible compromise in the offing. At a minimum, it confirms what
officials describe as an easing of some of the acrimony that has raged
between Moscow and Washington over the future of Syria, an ethnically
diverse nation whose stability is critical given its geographic position
in between powder kegs Iraq, Lebanon and Israel.
Panetta said Thursday that the U.S. fears Syria is thinking of using its chemical weapons.
“The intelligence that we have raises serious concern that this is being considered,” he told reporters. Other administration officials in recent days have spoken about Syrians preparing weapon components of sarin gas. The new activity, coupled with fears that rebel advances are making Assad more desperate, have led to the fear that he is deploying the weapons.
On Thursday, Syria’s Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad accused the United States and Europe of using the issue of chemical weapons to justify a future military intervention against Syria. He warned that any such intervention would be “catastrophic.”
It’s unclear what new approach Brahimi may outline. One possibility would involve resuscitating, with U.S. and Russian support, the political transition strategy both countries agreed on in Geneva in June.
That plan demanded several steps by the Assad regime to de-escalate
tensions and end the violence that activists say has killed more than
40,000 people since March 2011. It would then have required Syria’s
opposition and the regime to put forward candidates for a transitional
government, with each side having the right to veto nominees proposed by
the other.
If employed, the strategy would surely mean the end of more than four decades of an Assad family member at Syria’s helm. The opposition has demanded Assad’s departure and has rejected any talk of him staying in power. Yet it also would grant regime representatives the opportunity to block Sunni extremists and others in the opposition that they reject.
The transition plan never got off the ground this summer, partly because no pressure was applied to see it succeed by a deeply divided international community. Brahimi’s predecessor, former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who drafted the plan, then resigned his post in frustration.
The United States blamed the collapse on Russia for vetoing a third resolution at the UN Security Council that would have applied world sanctions against Assad’s government for failing to live by the deal’s provisions.
Russia insisted that the Americans unfairly sought Assad’s departure as a precondition and worried about opening the door to military action, even as Washington offered to include language in any UN resolution that would have expressly forbade outside armed intervention.
Should a plan similar to that one be proposed, the Obama
administration is likely to insist anew that it be internationally
enforceable — a step Moscow may still be reluctant to commit to.
In any case, the U.S. insists the tide of the war is turning definitively against Assad.
This news comes as the whereabouts of a recent high profile apparent defector from Syria became unclear.
Backtracking from earlier comments, the Obama administration says it does not know the whereabouts of Syrian foreign ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi, who disappeared this week.
State Department spokesman Mark Toner now says U.S. officials have seen “various reports” regarding Makdissi’s location but cannot confirm any of them — except that he’s not in the United States.
Toner had said Wednesday the U.S. understood the longtime foreign ministry spokesman was in London, but British officials later denied he was there.
Another official said Makdissi might be in a Persian Gulf country, but stressed that Washington was not tracking his movements. That official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter.
Although the chemical weapon agents had not yet been loaded into planes, the State Department source, quoted by NBC News, said that if they are “there’s little the outside world can do to stop it.”
French weekly Le Point is reporting that France is preparing a military response similar to that used against Libya. There is no ground assault or sustained air campaign planned, the magazine says, but several smaller raids that would target chemical weapon sites and take away President Bashar al-Assad’s air superiority.
The timing of Syria’s moves on their chemical weapons come as the situation is “accelerating” on the ground, with Assad’s regime losing to the rebels.
Diplomatic efforts to end Syria’s civil war moved forward Thursday with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton joining Russia’s foreign minister and the UN peace envoy to the Arab country for extraordinary three-way talks that suggested Washington and Moscow might finally unite behind a strategy as the Assad regime weakens.
In Washington, Defence Secretary Leon Panetta said intelligence reports raise fears that an increasingly desperate Assad is considering using his chemical weapons arsenal — which the U.S. and Russia agree is unacceptable. It was unclear whether he might target rebels within Syria or bordering countries, but growing concern over such a scenario was clearly adding urgency to discussions an ocean away in Ireland’s capital.
On the sidelines of a human rights conference, Clinton gathered with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and mediator Lakhdar Brahimi to look for a strategy the international community could rally around to end Syria’s 21-month civil war. The former Cold War foes have fought bitterly over how to address the conflict, but Clinton stressed before the meeting that they shared a common goal.
AP Photo/Narciso Contreras In
this Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2012 photo, a baby walker is seen near a hole
in a wall, recently done by Free Syrian Army fighters to help them
during heavy clashes with government forces in Aleppo, Syria.
“Events on the ground in Syria are accelerating and we see that in many different ways,” she said. “The pressure against the regime in and around Damascus seems to be increasing. We’ve made it very clear what our position is with respect to chemical weapons, and I think we will discuss that and many other aspects of what is needed to end the violence.”
Earlier Thursday, Clinton and Lavrov met separately for about 25 minutes. They agreed to hear Brahimi out on a path forward, a senior U.S. official said. The two also discussed issues ranging from Egypt to North Korea, as well as new congressional action aimed at Russian officials accused of complicity in the death of lawyer Sergei Magnitsky.
Washington and Moscow have more often publicly chastised each other than cooperated on an international strategy for Syria. The U.S. has criticized Russia for shielding its Arab ally. The Russians have accused the U.S. of meddling by demanding Assad’s downfall and ultimately seeking an armed intervention such as the one last year against the late Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi.
AP Photo/Narciso Contreras In
this Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2012 photo, Free Syrian Army fighters aim their
weapons inside an abandoned building during heavy clashes with
government forces in Aleppo, Syria.
Panetta said Thursday that the U.S. fears Syria is thinking of using its chemical weapons.
“The intelligence that we have raises serious concern that this is being considered,” he told reporters. Other administration officials in recent days have spoken about Syrians preparing weapon components of sarin gas. The new activity, coupled with fears that rebel advances are making Assad more desperate, have led to the fear that he is deploying the weapons.
On Thursday, Syria’s Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad accused the United States and Europe of using the issue of chemical weapons to justify a future military intervention against Syria. He warned that any such intervention would be “catastrophic.”
It’s unclear what new approach Brahimi may outline. One possibility would involve resuscitating, with U.S. and Russian support, the political transition strategy both countries agreed on in Geneva in June.
AP Photo/Narciso Contreras In
this Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2012 photo, a Free Syrian Army fighter uses a
tool to break a hole in the wall of a residents' home during heavy
clashes with government forces in Aleppo, Syria.
If employed, the strategy would surely mean the end of more than four decades of an Assad family member at Syria’s helm. The opposition has demanded Assad’s departure and has rejected any talk of him staying in power. Yet it also would grant regime representatives the opportunity to block Sunni extremists and others in the opposition that they reject.
The transition plan never got off the ground this summer, partly because no pressure was applied to see it succeed by a deeply divided international community. Brahimi’s predecessor, former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who drafted the plan, then resigned his post in frustration.
The United States blamed the collapse on Russia for vetoing a third resolution at the UN Security Council that would have applied world sanctions against Assad’s government for failing to live by the deal’s provisions.
Russia insisted that the Americans unfairly sought Assad’s departure as a precondition and worried about opening the door to military action, even as Washington offered to include language in any UN resolution that would have expressly forbade outside armed intervention.
AP Photo/Narciso ContrerasIn
this Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2012 photo, smoke rises from residential
buildings due heavy fighting between Free Syrian Army fighters and
government forces in Aleppo, Syria.
In any case, the U.S. insists the tide of the war is turning definitively against Assad.
This news comes as the whereabouts of a recent high profile apparent defector from Syria became unclear.
Backtracking from earlier comments, the Obama administration says it does not know the whereabouts of Syrian foreign ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi, who disappeared this week.
State Department spokesman Mark Toner now says U.S. officials have seen “various reports” regarding Makdissi’s location but cannot confirm any of them — except that he’s not in the United States.
Toner had said Wednesday the U.S. understood the longtime foreign ministry spokesman was in London, but British officials later denied he was there.
Another official said Makdissi might be in a Persian Gulf country, but stressed that Washington was not tracking his movements. That official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter.
AP Photo/Narciso Contreras In
this Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2012 photo, smoke rises from residential
buildings due heavy fighting between Free Syrian Army fighters and
government forces in Aleppo, Syria.
Labels: Armaments, Conflict, Defence, Multiculturalism, Syria, United States, Upheaval
posted by Pieface | 1:57 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home