Solving The Crime
The Texas-based International Center for 9/11 Studies appears to be honouring Toronto's Ryerson University by scheduling its annual meeting in Canada. Wow, really, wow! Texas, that's the second-largest State in the Union, isn't it? Not enough space and places in that B I G and wide-open state to find a suitable place to meet? Meeting in Canada to give the skeptics an international flavour?
Well, they are called the Toronto Hearings, after all. Catch them if you will, from September 8 to 11 and make your pitch there. For all one knows, the latest Republican candidate - and evidently a popular one - to make himself available as presidential material, Texas Governor Rick Perry, might even show up. He seems like a typical conspiracy theorist. Based on his pronouncements to date.
Suggesting that in Texas quick work in condemning, charging and jurying Ben Bernanke as a seditionist would be made in his home state. Under his governorship state-sanctioned capital punishment has thrived. And he has his own theories about evolution, too, having just informed a 9-year-old that evolution is "a theory that's out there" with some "gaps in it".
It's the gaps in credibility that the 9/11 skeptics are concerned with, evidently. The inexplicable, unexplained, the mysterious - and they are not credulous people, after all. And they're intent on presenting evidence that the U.S. Government conspired - possibly with Israel - to blow up the World Trade Center towers.
Those planes that the world saw on living television smashing into the towers - a mass illusion, that simply proves how diabolically clever the plotters were. It was all a ruse, albeit credible it appeared at the time. The purpose of which was to groom the American public to accept the need for their government to march in righteous vengeance against two innocent Muslim countries.
"These were horrific acts of violence and we should remember them, but we're afraid there won't be much critical reflection. There will be much reciting the story, and there will be a reinforcement of what some of us believe is the myth of 9/11." Thus saith Graeme MacQueen, member of the organizing steering committee.
Mr. MacQueen is also, coincidentally and impressively, a co-founder of McMaster University's Centre for Peace Studies. He is fully supportive of the theory that the twin towers' destruction was a result of controlled, contrived demolition plans that were wildly successful, and provided the world with lots of thrilling replays of the towers crumbling and people dying.
Confoundingly and to our shame, if it is indeed true, a Texas lawyer, James Gourley who founded the International Center for 9/11 Studies in 2008, claims Canadians appear "a bit more open to skepticism of 9/11 than people in America".
The center is dedicated to forging ahead in its determination to help "solve the crime".
Well, they are called the Toronto Hearings, after all. Catch them if you will, from September 8 to 11 and make your pitch there. For all one knows, the latest Republican candidate - and evidently a popular one - to make himself available as presidential material, Texas Governor Rick Perry, might even show up. He seems like a typical conspiracy theorist. Based on his pronouncements to date.
Suggesting that in Texas quick work in condemning, charging and jurying Ben Bernanke as a seditionist would be made in his home state. Under his governorship state-sanctioned capital punishment has thrived. And he has his own theories about evolution, too, having just informed a 9-year-old that evolution is "a theory that's out there" with some "gaps in it".
It's the gaps in credibility that the 9/11 skeptics are concerned with, evidently. The inexplicable, unexplained, the mysterious - and they are not credulous people, after all. And they're intent on presenting evidence that the U.S. Government conspired - possibly with Israel - to blow up the World Trade Center towers.
Those planes that the world saw on living television smashing into the towers - a mass illusion, that simply proves how diabolically clever the plotters were. It was all a ruse, albeit credible it appeared at the time. The purpose of which was to groom the American public to accept the need for their government to march in righteous vengeance against two innocent Muslim countries.
"These were horrific acts of violence and we should remember them, but we're afraid there won't be much critical reflection. There will be much reciting the story, and there will be a reinforcement of what some of us believe is the myth of 9/11." Thus saith Graeme MacQueen, member of the organizing steering committee.
Mr. MacQueen is also, coincidentally and impressively, a co-founder of McMaster University's Centre for Peace Studies. He is fully supportive of the theory that the twin towers' destruction was a result of controlled, contrived demolition plans that were wildly successful, and provided the world with lots of thrilling replays of the towers crumbling and people dying.
Confoundingly and to our shame, if it is indeed true, a Texas lawyer, James Gourley who founded the International Center for 9/11 Studies in 2008, claims Canadians appear "a bit more open to skepticism of 9/11 than people in America".
The center is dedicated to forging ahead in its determination to help "solve the crime".
Labels: Canada/US Relations, Culture, Technology, Terrorism, Traditions
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home