Abu Hamza extradition: US court hears terror suspects
BBC News online - 6 October 2012
Islamist
cleric Abu Hamza and four other terror suspects have appeared in court
in the US, having been extradited from the UK after a long legal battle.
In the same court, Adel Abdul Bary and Khaled al-Fawwaz pleaded not guilty.
Earlier, Babar Ahmad and Talha Ahsan pleaded not guilty in a court in Connecticut.
At the scene
Abu Hamza appeared in court under the name Mustafa Kamel Mustafa without his hook-shaped prosthetic hand. He was dressed in dark prison garb, wore glasses, and his grey hair and beard were well trimmed.
The judge began the short hearing by reading him his rights and briefly outlining the charges he was facing. The extremist preacher spoke only once to say "I do" when asked if he approved court documents signed under his name.
Asked if there were any other matters, his lawyer requested his prosthetics be returned immediately so he could "take care of his daily needs in a civilised manner". She also requested his medically fitted shoes be returned as they helped him to balance, and a full medical evaluation, saying he suffered from type two diabetes and high blood pressure.
The five suspects had left the UK from an RAF base on two flights, hours after the High Court rejected final appeals against their extradition on Friday.Abu Hamza faces 11 charges in the US relating to hostage-taking, conspiracy to establish a militant training camp and calling for holy war in Afghanistan.
Mr al-Fawwaz and Mr Bary are accused of being aides to the late al-Qaeda leader, Osama Bin Laden, in London.
Mr Ahmad and Mr Ahsan were indicted in 2004 and 2006 respectively for allegedly using a website from a Connecticut-based internet service provider to support terrorism in Afghanistan and the Russian region of Chechnya.
Hook removedAbu Hamza, who has no hands, came into court without his customary hook, wearing a short-sleeved blue prison shirt.
His court-appointed lawyer, Sabrina Shroff, asked that his prosthetics be immediately returned "so he can use his arms".
He listened to the 11 charges levelled against him, speaking only to confirm court documents signed under his name.
After their appearance in the federal court in New Haven, Connecticut, Mr Ahmad and Mr Ahsan were placed in custody until trial. Their lawyers declined to comment.
Their next appearance in court is scheduled for 15 October, a spokesman for US prosecutors told AFP news agency.
WHAT THEY ARE CHARGED WITH
- Abu Hamza: charged in connection with a hostage-taking in Yemen in 1998 that resulted in four deaths; a conspiracy to establish a terrorist training camp in Bly, Oregon, in 1999; and supporting violent jihad in Afghanistan in 2000 and 2001.
- Adel Abdul Bary and Khaled al-Fawwaz: charged with conspiring with members of al-Qaeda to kill US nationals and to attack US interests abroad. Bary alone is charged with murder; conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction; and other offences in connection with the 1998 bombings of the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, which killed 224 people.
- Babar Ahmed and Talha Ahsan: accused of operating a jihadist website
Much of the media focus has been
on Abu Hamza, whom the US first tried to extradite in 2004 on 11
charges, including a hostage-taking in Yemen in 1998 when four people
were killed.
The process was halted when the UK decided to try him on
allegations of soliciting to murder and stirring up racial hatred
relating to his sermons. He was convicted in 2006.UK Prime Minister David Cameron said: "I'm absolutely delighted that Abu Hamza is now out of this country.
"Like the rest of the public I'm sick to the back teeth of people who come here, threaten our country, who stay at vast expense to the taxpayer and we can't get rid of them."
Mary Galligan, acting deputy head of the FBI, said: "The extraditions of Abu Hamza, Bary and Fawwaz are a major milestone in our effort to see these alleged high-level terrorists face American justice.
She said they were accused of "planning and carrying out some of the most odious acts of al-Qaeda terrorism".
Jurisdiction argument Campaigners against the extradition of Mr Ahmad and Mr Ahsan argued that their alleged crimes had been committed while they were in the UK so they should be tried before British courts.
The US authorities accuse Mr Ahmad of running an important pro-jihad website called Azzam.com.
During the 1990s and early 2000s the English-language website played a key role in encouraging young Muslims in the West to support mujahideen causes in Bosnia, Chechnya and Afghanistan.
In the indictment, US prosecutors describe one of the most feared Chechen militant leaders of the time, the late Shamil Basayev, as a threat to US national security.
The Americans successfully argued that because the website was technically hosted by a company based in Connecticut, it had jurisdiction.
Mr Ahsan faces the same allegations as Mr Ahmad.
Both men also argued unsuccessfully that if they were convicted, they would be held at a special "supermax" prison in the US, where the conditions, including solitary confinement, amount to torture, and inhuman and degrading treatment.
Before his extradition, Mr Ahmad had been in prison in the UK since August 2004, setting what appeared to be a record for the longest time that a British national has been detained without trial in modern times.
Labels: Britain, Crisis Politics, Islamism, Justice, Terrorism, United States
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home