This is a blog dedicated to a personal interpretation of political news of the day. I attempt to be as knowledgeable as possible before commenting and committing my thoughts to a day's communication.
The Iran Dilemma: From the Energy-Money-Market Perspective
"My
guess is that on March 24th nothing will be done. Both the Iranians and
Americans are pointing at the end of March, and my guess is that there
will be enough agreement that they will be able to pull something
together, but it will be very broad -- and even that's not certain." "You
might see some additional cash flows around restricted Iranian assets
... but in my experience, you are not going to see any real relief on
sanctions for at least six months after a deal is done." Richard Nephew, program director, economic statecraft, sanctions and energy markets, Columbia Centre on Global Energy Policy
"A chance that we get a framework agreement or a 'political understanding' is high -- around 70%." "[Still
significant gaps] Most importantly,U.S. sanctions relief, which
Iranians demand upfront, and I just don't think the U.S. is going to go
there." "[A
deal] would place modest downward pressure on the oil price [but there]
is a lot of geopolitical momentum on both sides to make it harder to
walk back." Cliff Cupchan, chairman, Eurasia, Middle East and North Africa, Eurasia Group
"Iran could increase its oil production between 500,000 to 800,000 bpd within three to six months." "According
to Iran's five-year plan, the country had to invest $255-billion in its
energy industry from 2011-2015 [falling short due to international
sanctions and a ban on foreign investment]." Sara Vakhshouri, consultant, Washington
"The
big problem is that there are multi-layered sanctions by multiple
entities and you cannot just flip a switch and make them go away." "It's not hard to see how complex this spiderweb is." Helima Croft, head commodity strategy, RBC Capital Markets
Well,
that's the perspective from global money and oil markets, focusing only
on the balance between oil availability and cost, and the release of
international funds for investment purposes in one of the world's
largest oil-producing countries now constrained in marketing its output
and lacking needed release of foreign investments to upgrade its
creaking infrastructure.
That Tehran is a supporter of Islamist terror, and is itself a terrorist Islamist source is entirely irrelevant to the international money market; they too are constrained by virtue of sanctions.
Neither
Iran nor the international investment community are thrilled with those
sanctions, interfering with the flow of oil and money. What happens in
Syria, in Iraq, in Libya and in Yemen and Iran's role in the
confrontation between the split Middle East in its sectarian conflicts
is of little interest to those markets. Nor do they much care that the
United States hardly knows in which direction to turn first in its
entanglements, embarrassments and disappointments.
They
could ask an Iranian journalist, once influential in the campaign to
elect the current Iranian president, now asking for political asylum in
Switzerland his opinion. Amir Hossein Motaghi
would tell them that his profession in Iran is a lost cause since he no
longer wishes to write only what he is compelled to write, in
reflection of the Ayatollahs' perspective on all things Iranian versus
the international community.
According to his testimony printed in the British Telegraph,
the White House is frantic to persuade the other P5+1 members that all
should accept Iran's point of view; not a difficult persuasion for China
and Russia, but France and Britain might prove a problem. Germany is
hugely dependent on Russia for its energy and wouldn't mind a more
relaxed energy market, so it's kind of 50X50.
"The
U.S. negotiating team is mainly there to speak on Iran's behalf with
other members of the 5+1 countries and convince them of a deal", he said. And he should know.
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told his country in 2013
that economic sanctions will never force Iran into unwelcome concessions
over nuclear development.Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader, via Associated Press
And to obtain a more fully rounded perspective they could always confer with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who yesterday said "While [world powers] convene to sign this deal, Iran’s proxies in Yemen
are conquering large swaths of land in an effort to overtake the Bab
al-Mandab straits, so that they can change the balance of power in
shipping oil".
The
European Union before the sanctions were imposed in 2012, imported
452,000 barrels per day of Iranian oil. Understandably, they are anxious
to have those imports resumed, to aid them in their determination to
wean themselves away from Russian energy importation. But it is Iran
with the most to gain from an agreement, sitting on the world's
fourth-largest crude oil and second-largest natural gas reserves.
With,
unfortunately, its foreign trade and oil exports maimed by sanctions
targeting its financial services sector leaving its economy to contract
almost 6% as oil revenues dwindled from $93-billion to $33-billion. Even
China, India and Japan cut Iranian imports so that they languished last
year at their lowest levels in decades. Should an agreement be reached,
Iranian oil minister Bijan Namdar Zanganeh estimates a million barrels per day of Iranian crude could inter the market.
Yet it is Iran itself, despite Secretary of State John Kerry's puppyish
anxiety to placate and surrender one immovable position of the U.S.
after another to please Iran's demands, that balks at delivering to
President Barack Obama the 'success' he so bullishly seeks for his
departure legacy. Iran's acceptance of the need to send a large portion
of its uranium stockpile to Russia has taken a reverse step.
Iran's
deputy foreign minister surprised everyone by ruling out that agreement
to surrender the stockpile that Iran spent years and billions to amass.
Leaving
Mr. Kerry with an undoubted headache of volcanic proportions, and
challenging him to come up with some other ways to present to the
international community the assurance that it doesn't really matter,
and Iran can keep its enriched nuclear stockpile after all, and the
solution to the problem is simply to give Iran whatever it insists upon
and trust the word of the Ayatollahs that they have no interest in
nuclear arms, as an honourable Islamic country of great humanitarian
principles.
"The export of stocks of enriched uranium is not in our program, and we
do not intend sending them abroad. There is no
question of sending the stocks abroad."
Abbas Araqchi, Iranian nuclear negotiating official
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home