| ||
New
report by UN rights investigator accuses Israel of “inhuman
acts”
A
controversial United Nations human rights investigator is accusing Israel of
“inhuman acts" and calling on the world body to support a “legitimacy war”
against the Jewish state.
The
latest and final report
by the outgoing Richard Falk, which he is slated to present next month before
the UN Human Rights Council as its special rapporteur on the Palestinian
territories, recommends that the world court examine whether Israel is guilty of
the international crimes of “apartheid” and “ethnic cleansing,” and urges the UN
to investigate corporations that profit from “unlawful Israeli
activities.”
Falk,
invited to lecture later today at Princeton University, has been condemned by
world leaders on multiple occasions for spreading 9/11 conspiracy theories, and
for anti-Semitic acts such as his endorsement of a book that praises Adolph
Hitler.
(UN
Watch has launched an online petition
here urging Princeton University president
Christopher Eisgruber to speak out.)
Last
year, after Falk blamed the Boston Marathon terrorist attacks on “American
global domination” and “Tel Aviv,” he was sharply rebuked by UN
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, the U.S., Britain and Canada.
Falk
will be forced to step down this spring after serving the maximum term of six
years as a UN expert. He is scheduled to present his final report to the plenary
of the 47-nation council on March 24th.
Three law
professors are vying to replace him, one of whom, Christine Chinkin,
served the council before as co-author of the Goldstone Report.
Israel
recently returned to the Geneva forum following a two-year absence, after
Western countries finally agreed to admit Israel into their caucus. For decades
Israel was the only country at the council excluded from any of the council’s
five regional groups.
Despite
the correction of this longstanding breach of the UN Charter's equality
guarantee, the council continues to apply selective treatment against Israel,
making it the only country permanently featured on the agenda of
every meeting.
As
in years before, the upcoming March session is expected to enact half of all its
condemnatory resolutions against Israel. Moreover, there will be at least four
reports presented on alleged Israeli violations, including Falk's.
By
contrast, there will be no special reports or resolutions on systematic human
rights violations committed by major abusers such as China, Cuba, Russia and
Saudi Arabia. On the contrary, all four of these dictatorships were just elected
as members. Likewise, fellow UNHRC member states Algeria, Pakistan, Venezuela
and Vietnam will also enjoy immunity.
'INHUMAN
ACTS', 'MURDER', 'APARTHEID'
Falk’s
22-page report on the West Bank and Gaza repeats his past allegations concerning
Israeli settlements. He also offers a lengthy and detailed section arguing that
Israel is guilty of “inhuman acts" and “murder” as defined by the International
Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of
Apartheid.
Falk's
report makes no mention of war crimes or human rights violations by Hamas,
Islamic Jihad or the Palestinian Authority. In fact, the word "Hamas" appears
nowhere in the report.
Instead,
Falk points the finger at Israel -- and also at the UN.
"It
should be remembered that the suffering of the people of Palestine is
inseparably linked to the partition arrangements initially proposed by the
United Nations in 1947,” writes Falk. He also blames the world body for failing
to implement the Goldstone Report’s call to prosecute Israelis for war
crimes.
In
a thinly veiled reference to UN Watch’s work in exposing his
abuses and getting him condemned, Falk’s report twice complains that
he was subjected to “defamatory attacks,” which he said had the effect of
“diverting attention from substantive issues integral to the mandate.” He urges
the UN to afford his successor “better protection” in this regard.
In
June, Falk called for UN Watch to be investigated, prompting a sharp rebuke from
U.S. envoy Eileen Donahoe.
"It
once again starkly demonstrates that he is unfit to serve in his role as a UN
special rapporteur," she said. Canadian Minister of Multiculturalism Jason
Kenney also defended UN Watch on the floor of the parliament. (Click for
video.)
FALK
BLAMES U.S. & NEOCONSERVATIVES FOR 9/11 ATTACKS, ALLEGES MEDIA
'COVER-UP'
In
2008, Falk called for
an official commission to study the role neoconservatives may have played in the
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. In a 2011 blog post, he accused U.S.
authorities of an "apparent cover-up," for which he was condemned by Ban Ki-moon
in an address to the council plenary (video
here).
Falk
has on numerous
occasions legitimized the most extreme 9/11 conspiracy
theorists.
The
European Union took a strong
stand against Falk's previous report in June. “The
EU continues to regret the unbalanced mandate of the Special Rapporteur and is
also concerned that parts of the report include political considerations," its
envoy told the plenary. "In the past, the EU emphasized that future reports
should be based on a more factual and legal analysis, and we regret to see no
genuine progress in that
direction.”
|
Labels: Controversy, Human Rights, Hypocrisy, United Nations
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home