In Defence of His Culture

"This was the most sophisticated and spectacular political attack committed in Europe since the Second World War.  If one can force the Norwegian Labour Party to change their immigration policy by executing 77 people, that will contribute to holding our values and culture."  Anders Behring Brievik

Given the public venue and the forum to ventilate and explain his ideology, Anders Behring Brievik was happy to oblige.  He had worked for a long time on the details of his lecture to the court in Oslo that is determined to see justice done.  Justice is being done, according to Norway's system, in permitting a mass murderer to explain himself, to read his very own personal statement.

Even without the courtesy extended to this man by Norwegian law, he has made it abundantly clear that he is proud of what he planned and executed.  Coming as close to playing the role of a clearly superior being, able to arm himself with the Angel of Death by his side and living to tell his tale of justification.  He did slaughter 69 young Norwegians in what has been described as 'cold blood'.

He does indeed have the presence of a cold-blooded murderer, for he has no regrets.  Only that perhaps he might have, had his original plans succeeded, managed to murder journalists, not young people at a summer camp on an island, having nowhere to flee to escape from this slayer-of-youth. 

But, even though it would have made great sense to him to kill journalists responsible for catering to the issue of multiculturalism that he so despised, the slaughter of young people belonging to the Norwegian Labour Party that allows mass immigration to his defenceless country would do.

"I acted in defence of my culture and of my people and so I ask to be acquitted", he said proudly. 

Proud to pantomime the Nazi salute at the previous day's trial opening, as well.  And cognizant of the close ideological relationship between fascism and al-Qaeda, admiring of them both.  Osama bin Laden's revolutionary religious politics, he said represented the "most successful revolutionary force in the world".

Hating the Islamists and admiring them at the same time for their resolute determination.  Like his; he is, if nothing else, resolutely determined.  And he doesn't mind apportioning fault for the eclipse of his beloved Norway, blaming "100% of the world's news organizations for pumping out multicultural propaganda 24 hours a day". 

His moral courage, as far as he is concerned, is impeccable, and must be recognized.  He is innocent of the charges brought against him.  At one time he had an Internet company that sold false diplomas, enabling him to amass a profit of $687,000.  He is not, it appears proud of having forged certificates for profit, admitting it to have been "morally despicable".

Slaughtering 77 Norwegians, however, is entirely justified to advance his admirable cause.  Now, all Norwegians, Europeans anywhere, citizens of any country that is not Muslim-dominated, will hesitate before stating their opinion with respect to the unease they feel at the advance of Islam and Sharia law advocated by immigrant Muslim populations that are steadily infiltrating Europe.

He has his pride and he has his prejudices; one cancels out the other; for the latter enlists the former to act, proudly and responsibly.  He is to be thought of as a Knight Templar, riding to the rescue of a culture, a heritage, a nation under siege.  He is entirely justified in adopting the martyrology of the jihadists. 

Surely they must find it in them to reciprocity in admiring his handiwork?